A Bahamian-led study on GLP-1 drugs and colorectal cancer
In January 2026 The Tribune reported that Dr Colton Jones, a Bahamian cancer fellow at the University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio's Mays Cancer Center, led an international real-world study suggesting that diabetes and obesity drugs may help prevent colorectal cancer1. The work was presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium in San Francisco (abstract 18)13. "As a Bahamian spearheading research of this magnitude, I believe this is a proud moment for our nation," Dr Jones told the paper1.
Study design and results
The team used TriNetX, a de-identified database of health records from 106 health organisations5, and matched GLP-1 receptor agonist users with aspirin users by propensity score: 281,656 patients, 140,828 in each arm, mean age 58, about 69 % women23. Follow-up began six months after the first prescription; median follow-up was 2,153 days for GLP-1 users and 1,743 days for aspirin users2.
- Main result. Colorectal cancer risk was 35.7 % lower with GLP-1 drugs than with aspirin (hazard ratio 0.643; 95 % CI 0.531–0.778)5.
- High-risk patients. In people with a family history, genetic predisposition or specific comorbidities, the reduction was 42.1 % (HR 0.579; 95 % CI 0.401–0.837)5.
- Absolute numbers. Incidence was 0.13 % with GLP-1 drugs and 0.176 % with aspirin3; more than 2,000 people would need to be treated for one person to have a lower risk2.
- Subgroups. Protection appeared strongest in people who started before age 45 and was seen regardless of obesity or diabetes status; no reduction was seen in tobacco users or people with atherosclerotic disease1.
- Safety. Acute kidney injury, stomach ulcers and gastrointestinal bleeding were less common with GLP-1 drugs; diarrhoea and abdominal pain were more common2.
Reports differ on which individual drugs reached significance: The ASCO Post listed semaglutide, liraglutide and dulaglutide2, while AJMC reported semaglutide (risk ratio 0.758) as the only agent with a significant benefit and noted small samples for the others3. Both agree tirzepatide did not show a significant effect23.
Why aspirin was the comparator
"While aspirin has been studied for colorectal cancer prevention, its modest benefit and bleeding risks limit its use," Dr Jones said2. In 2022 the US Preventive Services Task Force concluded that "the evidence is unclear whether aspirin use reduces the risk of colorectal cancer incidence or mortality"6. An earlier analysis in drug-naive patients with type 2 diabetes compared GLP-1 drugs with seven other antidiabetic classes and also linked them to lower colorectal cancer risk8.
Limits of the evidence
This is a retrospective analysis of database records5, presented at a meeting1, not a randomised trial; propensity matching balances only the factors that were measured, so unmeasured differences between people prescribed GLP-1 drugs and people taking aspirin can remain. The cohort was predominantly white and female, and Dr Jones said "Because Black men have higher CRC incidence and mortality, further studies are needed to validate these findings"3. The Tribune noted that clinical trials will be needed1. The American Cancer Society states plainly that GLP-1 drugs "are not approved for cancer prevention" and that some early findings hint at a possible association with thyroid cancer that needs more research4.
What it means in The Bahamas
The finding matters locally because of who could be treated. The Tribune cited a 2025 PAHO study placing The Bahamas first in the Americas for adult obesity, with about 40 % of adults diagnosed with obesity; GLP-1 drugs cost $250 to more than $1,500 a month and are not covered by the national prescription drug plan, though the Wellness Minister has said NHI coverage is planned7. The cardiometabolic case is already established: in SELECT, semaglutide cut major cardiovascular events by 20 % in people with obesity and cardiovascular disease9, and in STEP 1 it produced a mean 14.9 % weight loss at 68 weeks10. The World Health Organization's December 2025 guideline conditionally recommends GLP-1 drugs for adults with obesity11. A cancer signal, if confirmed in trials, would add to that case; it does not yet justify prescribing for prevention4.
Sources
- Munnings L. Bahamian researcher: Obesity drugs may prevent colorectal cancer. The Tribune. 8 January 2026. tribune242.com ↗
- The ASCO Post. Study Finds GLP-1RAs Were Associated With a Reduced Risk of Developing Colorectal Cancer vs Aspirin. 25 April 2026. ascopost.com ↗
- Bonavitacola J. GLP-1s More Effective at Preventing Colorectal Cancer Than Aspirin. AJMC. 6 January 2026. ajmc.com ↗
- American Cancer Society / ASCO. Can GLP-1s Help Reduce the Risk of Cancer? 26 March 2026. cancer.org ↗
- OncLive. Dr Jones on the Protective Benefit and Tolerability of GLP-1 Agonists vs Aspirin for CRC Prevention. 14 May 2026. onclive.com ↗
- US Preventive Services Task Force. Aspirin Use to Prevent Cardiovascular Disease: Preventive Medication. Final recommendation, 26 April 2022. uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org ↗
- Lowe A. 'Desperation' driving black market demand for weight loss drugs. The Tribune. 1 September 2026. tribune242.com ↗
- Wang L, et al. GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and Colorectal Cancer Risk in Drug-Naive Patients With Type 2 Diabetes, With and Without Overweight/Obesity. JAMA Oncol. 2024;10(2):256-258. PubMed 38060218 ↗
- Lincoff AM, et al. Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Obesity without Diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2023;389(24):2221-2232. PubMed 37952131 ↗
- Wilding JPH, et al. Once-Weekly Semaglutide in Adults with Overweight or Obesity. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(11):989-1002. PubMed 33567185 ↗
- World Health Organization. WHO issues global guideline on the use of GLP-1 medicines in treating obesity. 1 December 2025. who.int ↗
- Pan American Health Organization. PAHO calls for strengthened pharmacovigilance following reports of misuse of GLP-1 medicines indicated for treating obesity in adults. 3 March 2026. paho.org ↗
Informational article. It summarizes news, official statements and published studies; it is not medical or legal advice. Sources were checked on the publication date.